Saturday, 10 September 2016

SAYYID SABIQ: JAMA' OF SOLATS

TRANSLATION FROM FIQH AS-SUNNAH (SAYYID SABIQ) WITH ARABIC TEXTS

JAMA’OF SOLATS DUE TO ILLNESS OR INCAPACITY ('UDZUR) 

  Imam Ahmad (bin Hanbal), Qadi Hussain, al-Khattabi, and al-Mutawali of the Shaf'i school are of the opinion that it is allowed to jama’ two solats either by “taqdiim” or “ta’khiir”, due to the incapacity of illness because the hardship related to it is more severe than rain.


An-Nawawi says: "This is a strong opinion based on [sound] evidence." In al-Mughni it is stated: "The illness which permits one to jama’ is the one which is afflicted by hardship and weakness when he prays each solat according to its period."


The Hanbali school expands the scope allowing jama’ by taqdiim or ta’khiir for those who are ill and in a state of fear,i.e. it allows jama’ for:

(a) The woman who is breast-feeding: it is hard for her to wash her clothes in every period of solat.

(b) The woman who is plagued by a prolonged flow of blood (istihaadhah),

(c) The person who cannot control his urine,

(d) The person who is incapable of performing ‘tahaarah’ (to himself),

(e)and the person who fears for his life(self:nafs), wealth(maal), or honour (‘irdh).


Ibn Taimiyyah says: "Among the opinions the widest scope on this question is that of the Hanbali school which allows jama’ (1) if he is busy since an-Nasa'i has narrated this from (marfuu’ ilaa) the Prophet (saw) to the extent that (2) it (Hanbali school) allows jama’ for the cook and baker, and anyone in these two similar professions who fears harming his wealth (e.g. investment, bisness).


JAMA’ DUE TO NEED.

  Imam an-Nawawi states in his commentary on Sahih Muslim: "A group of scholars tend to allow jama’ during residence (not necessary during travel) due to the need of a person who requires it frequently.


This is the statement of Ibn Sireen and Ashhab from the companions of Malik, and al-Khattabi records it from al-Qifal and ash-Shaashi al-Kabiir from the companions of ash-Shafi'i and from Abu Ishaq al-Maruzi, and from a number of ashab al-ahadith, and Ibn Munzir has chosen (this opinion).

This is supported by the explicit statement of ibn 'Abbas: '(3) (The Prophet performed jama’ because)he did not want to put his ummah to hardship, so he neither gave illness as a reason nor any other reasons.'


The hadith from Ibn 'Abbas, mentioned previously, has been recorded by Imam Muslim who states: "The Messenger of Allah performed the jama’ of zuhr and 'asr and then the maghrib and 'isha in Medinah without there being any fear or rain." Ibn 'Abbas was asked: "Why did the Prophet do this?"

He replied: "(4)He did not want any hardship for his ummah."


Al-Bukhari and Muslim narrated from Ibn Abbas that at Medina, the Prophet prayed seven rak'at (Maghrib and Ishaa together) and eight rak’at (Zuhr and Asr together).

Muslim also narrated from 'Abdullah ibn Shaqiq that one day, 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbas delivered a khutbah (lecture) to us after the 'asr (solat) until well after the sun had set and the stars began to appear. The people started to say: "Solat! Solat!" A man from the tribe of Taim continuously repeating without stopping: "Solat! Solat!"

Then, Ibn 'Abbas said: "Are you teaching me the sunnah? May you have no mother (He scolded the man)." Then he said: "I saw the Messenger of Allah performed the jama’ of the zuhr and 'asr and the maghrib and 'isha."

'Abdullah ibn Shaqiq commented: "(5)I felt some uneasiness in my heart about this (Ibn Abbas’ opinion), so I went to Abu Hurairah to ask him about that, and he confirmed what Ibn 'Abbas had said."


الجمع بسبب المرض أو العذر

: ذهب الامام أحمد والقاضي حسين والخطابي والمتولي من الشافعية إلى جواز الجمع تقديما وتأخيرا بعذر المرض لان المشقة فيه أشد من المطر .

 قال النووي : وهو قوي في الدليل . وفي المغني : والمرض المبيح للجمع هو ما يلحقه به بتأدية كل صلاة في وقتها مشقة وضعف .

 وتوسع الحنابلة فأجازوا الجمع تقديما وتأخيرا لاصحاب الاعذار وللخائف . فأجازوه للمرضع التي يشق عليها غسل الثوب في وقت كل صلاة ، وللمستحاضة ولمن به سلس بول ، وللعاجز عن الطهارة ولمن خاف على نفسه أو ماله أو عرضه

قال ابن تيمية : وأوسع المذاهب في الجمع مذهب أحمد فإنه جوز الجمع (1) إذا كان شغل كما روى النسائي ذلك مرفوعا إلى النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم إلى أن قال :(2) يجوز الجمع أيضا للطباخ والخباز ونحوهما ممن يخشى فساد ماله.


  الجمع للحاجة
  قال النووي في شرح مسلم : ذهب جماعة من الائمة إلى جواز الجمع في الحضر للحاجة لمن يتخذه عادة .

 وهو قول ابن سيرين وأشهب من أصحاب مالك ، وحكاه الخطابي عن القفال والشاشي الكبير من أصحاب الشافعي وعن أبي إسحاق المروزي وعن جماعة من أصحاب الحديث واختاره ابن المنذر ويؤيده ظاهر قول ابن عباس :  (3) أراد أن لا يحرج أمته فلم يعلله بمرض ولا غيره .

  وحديث ابن عباس الذي يشير إليه ما رواه مسلم عنه قال : جمع رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم بين الظهر والعصر ، والمغرب والعشاء بالمدينة في غير خوف ولا مطر . قيل لابن عباس : ماذا أراد بذلك ؟

 قال : (4) أراد ألا يحرج أمته .
 وروى البخاري ومسلم عنه أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم صلى بالمدينة سبعا  وثمانيا : الظهر والعصر والمغرب والعشاء .

 وعند مسلم عن عبد الله بن شقيق قال : خطبنا ابن عباس يوما بعد العصر حتى غربت الشمس وبدت النجوم وجعل الناس يقولون : الصلاة الصلاة قال : فجاءه رجل من بني تيم لم يفتر ولا ينثني : الصلاة الصلاة ، فقال ابن عباس : أتعلمني بالسنة لا أم لك ! ثم قال : رأيت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم جمع بين الظهر والعصر ، والمغرب والعشاء . قال عبد الله بن شقيق (5) فحاك في صدري من ذلك شئ ، فأتيت أبا هريرة فسألته فصدق مقالته .





Tuesday, 6 September 2016

ARGUMENTATION FOR MY STUDENTS

"Pokemon Go should be banned/haramized because it is produced by Freemasonry with a secret agenda."

Do you agree?


SAMPLE RESPONSE

ARGUMENT
Some people agree with the above arguments in view of the following premises:

A) they detected masonic symbols in the game. The game promotes darwinism which leads to atheism. Every freemason is an atheist.

B) The game has caused many accidents. Fans are so fanatic with the game to the extent that they even play it when driving or crossing roads.


COUNTER-ARGUMENT
However, some argue that it should be banned in view of the following premises:


a) Argument A above contains the barrier of stereotyping because it overgeneralizes that all freemasons are atheists. In reality, every member of freemason must prove his belief in God in order to be qualified as a masonic member.

b) Argument B above contains that fallacy of red herring because it diverts the issue from game to fans. The issue at stake is about the GAME, not about the attitude of its FANS. Every game and even religion has some fans who are fanatics and they have done stupid things but this does not necessarily means the game or religion concerned should be banned. If one is consistent, then one must also ban every game or even religion that causes harm to humanity.


REBUTTAL
After evaluating the argument for and against the banning of pokemon go above, I come to the conclusion that it should not be banned but precautions must be applied. This is based on the following premises:


a) I think that symbols should not be something to be worried about because it is every company, every organization does impose its symbols on its products. However, the authority must make always make sure that symbols in Pokemon go do not promote negative attitudes such as violence, extremism, materialism.


b) Islam allows entertainment. But since one of the maqasid shari'ah is preservation of nafs (self), then one must have enough data that playing pokemon causes a significant increase in the number of accidents before one bans it. Since so far no solid research has been done on C&S of pokemon where statistics of accidents are supplied with proper analysis, I proposed NOT to haramize pokemon go.  But in view of its bans in Israel, South Korea where it is not allowed in certain areas, I think we should not fall into the fallacy of false alternatives where one has to choose either haram or halal. I think we also have the 3rd alternative i.e. makruh. This I choose to impose a soft makruh on the play of pokemon go. We need to give up minor benefit in order to avoid major harm.  We need to give up the minor benefit of entertainment, of exercise thru playing pokemon go. This is to avoid the major harm of letting a foreign company invading our personal privacy and getting latest pictures of some important areas in our country.

Monday, 5 September 2016

HAYY IBN YAQZAN REACHES OUT

After he had come back to the sensible world from the excursions he had undertaken, he became weary of the concerns of this life and he strongly yearned for the ultimate life. He sought to return to that station through the same means by which he had sought it at first, till he was able to attain it with less effort than before and also to stay there longer than he had stayed before. Then he returned to the sensible world, and attempted later to attain his station once more and attained it with less effort than in both the first and the second preceding attempts, and his stay there was longer too. And so it grew easier and easier for him to attain that noble station and to continue in it longer and longer until he could attain it whenever he pleased and stay in it for as long as he pleased. He used to keep himself in that station and not turn away from it except when the necessities of his body, which he had cut down to the bare minimum, demanded it. (1) In all this, he used to wish that it would please God, the Mighty and Majestic, to deliver him altogether from his body, which caused his separation from that station, so as to give himself up perpetually to his (supreme) pleasure and so as to be relieved from the pain he suffered every time he had to retire from his station to attend to the necessities of the body.

(2) He continued in this state of affairs until he was past the seventh septenary of his birth, that is, he was fifty years old. Then he happened to come together with Asal; the story of what took place between them will be narrated– God willing– in what follows.

It is told that on an island close to the one on which Hayy the son of Yaqzan was born– according to one of the two different accounts of the circumstances of his birth– there arrived one of the true religions received from one of the old prophets– upon whom be the blessings of God. It was a religion that imitated all the true beings through parables that present images of those things and establish their descriptions in the souls, as is customary in addressing the multitude. This religion continued to spread on the island and kept growing and gaining in power until the king adopted it himself and made the people embrace it.

            (3)Now there had grown in that island two young men of virtue and good will, called respectively Asal and Salaman, who embraced that religion and accepted it eagerly. They took it upon themselves to observe all its Laws and to follow regularly its practices; this formed the basis of their friendship. Sometimes they used to study the wording of that religious Law concerning the attributes of God, the Mighty and Majestic, and His angels, and also the character of resurrection, rewards, and punishments.

(4) Of the two, Asal delved deeper into the esoteric meaning; he was more apt to find spiritual notions, and was a more ambitious interpreter. As for Salaman, he was more apt to keep to the apparent meaning, to avoid interpretation, and to abstain from examination and reflection. However, both assiduously performed the external practices (of the religious Law), disciplined themselves, and controlled their passions.

(5) Now there were in this religious Law certain arguments that favored seclusion and solitude, indicating that these led to salvation and (ultimate) success; and there were other arguments that favored sociability and adherence to the whole body of the community (Jama'ah).

(6)Asal devoted himself to the search for seclusion and favored the argument for it, because he was naturally inclined to continued meditation, to heeding the warnings (of the religious Law), and to penetrating deeply into the meanings (of the things mentioned in it); and it was through solitude that he most frequently accomplished these objectives.

 (7) Salaman, on the other hand, devoted himself to adhering to the whole body of the community and favored the argument for this position, because he was naturally timid as regards thought and examination. Following the majority, he thought, would lead to the suppression of evil thoughts and the removal of the promptings of the devil. Their differences on this issue caused them to separate.

Asal had heard about the island on which it was said that Hayy the son of Yaqzan was formed. He knew also of its fertility, conveniences, and temperate climate, and that the one who seeks solitude can achieve it there. Resolved to move there and to retire from the company of men for the rest of his life, he gathered together what money he possessed; with a part of it he hired a ship to carry him to that island, and the rest he distributed among the poor. He bade farewell to his friend (Salaman) and went aboard.

The mariners transported him to the island, set him ashore, and withdrew. Asal remained there worshipping God, the Mighty and Majestic, magnifying Him, sanctifying Him, and meditating upon His most beautiful names and exalted attributes without any interruption in the presence of his mind or disturbance in his thoughts. Whenever he felt the need for food, he took from the fruits or game of the island enough to satisfy his hunger. He remained in this state a while, enjoying the most complete felicity and the greatest delight through an intimate intercourse with his Lord, experiencing every day His kindness, the excellence of His gifts, and the ease with which He enabled him to satisfy his necessary needs and nourishment– all of which confirmed his belief in Him and consoled Asal's heart.

In the meantime, Hayy the son of Yaqzan was wholly immersed in his sublime stations. He never left his cave but once a week to take whatever nourishment was at hand. This is the reason why Asal did not discover his presence at first; he used to walk around the island and go over all its parts without seeing a human being or observing the traces of any footsteps. This swelled his joy and gladdened his heart as he was firmly resolved to lead the most retired and solitary life that was possible, until Hayy the son of Yaqzan happened to go out one day to seek his provisions at a place where Asal happened to be.

They both spied one another. Asal did not entertain any doubt but that Hayy was a retired worshiper who must have come to that island in search of solitude as he himself had done, and feared that should he come up and make his acquaintance, this might disturb Hayy's state and disrupt the pursuit he was engaged in. Hayy the son of Yaqzan, on the other hand, did not know what Asal was; for of all the animals he had seen, he had never seen anything with such a form.

Now Asal had on a black coat made out of hair and wool, which Hayy the son of Yaqzan thought was a natural part of him and at which he stood wondering for quite a while. Asal turned and fled from fear that he might distract Hayy. But Hayy the son of Yaqzan ran after him out of his natural curiosity to look for the truth of things. When he saw that Asal began to run faster, he slowed down and hid himself from him, so that Asal thought he had left him and gone off far from the place where he was.

Asal then proceeded with his prayer, recitation, invocation, supplication, and lamentation, until this made him forget everything else. Then Hayy the son of Yaqzan started to draw closer and closer, with Asal unaware of his presence, until he came so close as to hear his recitation and praise (of God), observing in him a sense of humility and that he was weeping. Hayy heard a pleasant voice and harmonious sounds such as he had never heard before in any kind of animal.

Then he considered Asal's shape and lineaments and saw that he was of the same form as himself. He also found that the coat he had on was not a natural skin but an artificial attire like his own. Upon watching the sincere humility of Asal, his supplication and weeping, he did not doubt but that he was one of those essences who know the True One. He felt himself seized by an affection toward him and a desire to know what was the matter with him, and what caused his weeping. He drew closer to him till Asal felt his presence and took to flight.

Hayy the son of Yaqzan chased him energetically until he caught up with him– as the result of the vigor and the capacity, intellectual as well as physical, that God had bestowed upon him– seized him, held him fast, and would not let go of him. When Asal looked at him and saw that he was clothed with animal furs, his hair grown so long as to cover a great part of his body, and perceived his alertness and great strength, he trembled from fear and began to implore and entreat him with words that Hayy the son of Yaqzan could not understand and did not know what they were meant to convey. He could, however, see the signs of alarm on Asal's face; whereupon he endeavored to allay his fear with such voices as he had learned from some of his animals. He stroked his head and both sides of his neck, and caressed him, showing him a great joy and gladness, until Asal's agitation calmed and he understood that he meant him no harm.

Asal had formerly studied most languages as a result of his love for the science of interpretation and had become an expert in them. So he began to speak to Hayy the son of Yaqzan in every language he knew, asking him about himself and trying to make himself understood, but without success.

Hayy the son of Yaqzan wondered all the while at what he heard, not knowing what it was. Nevertheless, he showed gladness and good disposition; and they mutually wondered at each other. Asal had conserved some of the provisions he had brought along from the inhabited island. He offered it to Hayy the son of Yaqzan, who, having never seen such food before, did not know what it was. Asal ate a little of it and signaled Hayy to eat too.

 Hayy the son of Yaqzan remembered the dietary obligation he had resolved to abide by. Not knowing the constitution of the food he had been offered, nor whether or not he should permit himself to partake of it, he declined to eat. Asal, nonetheless, kept asking him and urging him beseechingly. As Hayy the son of Yaqzan had become fond of Asal and was afraid lest he might be vexed if he should continue to refuse, he went ahead and ate some of the food.

As soon as he had tasted it and liked it, Hayy realized that he had done wrong by violating the covenant he made with himself as regards diet. He repented what he did and wanted to separate from Asal and go back to his former condition, seeking to return to his sublime station. But he could not attain the vision quickly.

Thereupon he decided to stay with Asal in the sensible world until he discovered what he really was and until he felt no more desire to be with him, after which he might apply himself to his station without any interruption. Thus he remained in the company of Asal. Now as Asal perceived Hayy's inability to speak, he felt secure since no harm could threaten his faith from his company. He hoped to instruct him in speaking, in science, and in the faith, so that he (Asal) might obtain a great reward and be favored by God.

Asal began to teach him how to speak, first, by pointing at particular beings and pronouncing their names, repeating them several times, and then making Hayy pronounce them. Hayy pronounced them at the same time as he in turn pointed to each being, until Asal taught him all the names. He helped him to improve gradually, until, in a very short time, Hayy could speak.

Then Asal began to ask him about his condition, and whence he came to that island. Hayy the son of Yaqzan told him he knew nothing of his origin, nor of a father or a mother beyond the gazelle that reared him. Then Hayy described his experiences from beginning to end, and how he ascended in knowledge until he attained a degree of union (with God). Asal heard him describe those truths and the essences separate from the sensible world, which know the essence of the Truth, the Mighty and Majestic. Then Hayy described the essence of the Truth, the Exalted and Majestic, with His beautiful qualities. And finally Hayy described, as far as he could, what he beheld when he attained union (with God), the joys of those who unite (with God), and the pains of those who are veiled from Him.

(8) After hearing all this, Asal had no doubt that all the things given in his own religious Law concerning God, the Mighty and Majestic, His angels, His books, His messengers, the last day, and His paradise and hell, are the similitudes of these things that Hayy the son of Yaqzan had beheld.

The eye of his heart was thereby opened, the fire of his mind kindled. (9) He found that reason and tradition agree, and he found a better access to the ways of interpretation.

There remained not one difficulty in the religious Law that he did not now see clearly, nor anything locked up that was not opened, nor anything obscure that did not become plain. Thereupon he passed into the ranks of the men of understanding (xii, .111). From that moment, (10) Asal looked upon Hayy the son of Yaqzan with veneration and respect, and he was convinced that Hayy was one of the saints of God who need have no fear; neither shall they suffer (ii, 38, 262, 274). He took it upon himself to wait upon him, to follow in his steps, and to accept his directions in regard to the fulfilment of the religious‑legal practices that his religion had taught him, but <that> had seemed to be contradictory.

Hayy the son of Yaqzan, in his turn, began to inquire from him about himself and his present condition. Whereupon Asal proceeded to describe the island from which he came, the people who inhabit it, and their way of life before and after religion reached them. He described to him all the content of the religious Law concerning the divine world, paradise, hell, the quickening of the dead, the resurrection, the assembly for a final judgment, the balance, and the bridge. (11) Hayy the son of Yaqzan understood all this, not finding in it anything that disagreed with what he had intuitively seen in his sublime station. He recognized that the one who described these things and brought them forth was truthful in his description, veridical in his words, and a messenger from his Lord. He believed in him, accepted his truthfulness, and bore witness to his mission.

(12) Then he began to find out from Asal what were the acts of worship that he (the messenger) ordained as duties. Asal described prayer, almsgiving, fasting, pilgrimage, and similar external practices. Hayy accepted them, and he took it upon himself to carry them out in compliance with the command of whose author's veracity he had become convinced.

(13) There only remained two points that kept him wondering and whose wisdom he could not understand.

One point was why this messenger, in the greater part of his description of the divine world, used parables? (14) Why he avoided the clear disclosure (of the truth) and thus led men to fall into the great error of attributing corporeality to Him and believe certain things about the essence of the Truth from which He is completely exempt? And why he did the same concerning rewards and punishments?

The other point was (15) why he confined himself to those duties and acts of worship and permitted acquisition of wealth and excessive consumption of food so that people gave themselves up to vain occupations and turned away from the Truth.

Hayy's own opinion was that nobody ought to eat anything more than necessary to keep body and soul together. As for riches, they meant nothing to him. He saw no point to the rules of the religious Law in regard to wealth, such as alms‑giving in its various forms, trading, and usury, and in regard to penalties and punishments. All this he found strange and considered it superfluous. He said that if people understood the truth of the matter they would avoid these vanities, turn toward the Truth, and dispense with all this. Nobody will then own private property for which alms would have to be paid, hands cut off for stealing it, or people die for robbing it.


(16) What misled Hayy was his belief that all men were endowed with excellent natures, clear‑sighted sagacity, and resolute souls. He was not aware how stupid, deficient, ill‑opinioned, and weak in resolution they were, as the cattle, nay, they are further astray from the way (xxv, 44).



Hayy ibn Yaqzan

by

Ibn TUFAYL

(d. 1185)






Translated by George N. ATIYEH








(in Medieval Political Philosophy
eds. R. LERNER & M. MAHDI)






Cornell University Press

Ithaca, New York 1963







C.S. 202

American University of Beirut

2002‑2003


Friday, 2 September 2016

UST AHMAD ADNAN FADZIL: ISU NAJIS

(Ijazah Sarjana Muda (Syari'ah) Uni. Al-Azhar (1997). Dipl. Takhassus Fiqh (Pra M.A) INSANIAH-Al-Azhar (2004). Telah menghasilkan lebih 30 buah buku yang diterbitkan. Pengendali laman soal-jawab agama; www.ilmudanulamak.blogspot.com)


Apa yang dimaksudkan najis?

(1)Najis bermaksud kekotoran yang menghalang sahnya sembahyang, yakni; tidak sah sembahyang jika terdapat pada pakaian atau badan atau tempat sembahyang. (2) Pada dasarnya, setiap benda yang ada di alam ini adalah suci dan tidak najis kecualilah perkara-perkara yang telah dinyatakan oleh Syara’ sebagai najis. Selagi tidak ada nas atau dalil Syara’ menjelaskan bahawa sesuatu itu najis, maka ia kekal dengan hukum asalnya iaitu suci dan bersih.

Apakah benda-benda yang dianggap najis oleh Syarak?

Menurut (3)Imam Ibnu Rusyd; empat benda disepakati oleh ulamak sebagai najis, iaitu;
1. Bangkai haiwan darat yang berdarah mengalir
2. Daging babi
3. Darah dari haiwan darat jika ia mengalir, yakni banyak.
4. Air kencing manusia dan tahinya.

[rujukan utk (3) http://xifunaserfailasufi.blogspot.my/2016/09/ibn-rushd-bidayah-al-mujtahid-najis.html )

Selain dari empat di atas (seperti; arak, tahi binatang,) muntah dan sebagainya lagi) di kalangan ulamak terdapat beza pandangan; ada yang menganggapnya najis dan ada yang tidak.[1] Menurut Imam asy-Syaukani; perkara-perkara yang ada dalil Syarak menyebutnya sebagai najis ialah;
1. Tahi dan air kencing manusia
2. Air liur anjing
3. Tahi binatang (khusus kepada tahi kuda, baghal dan kaldai sahaja menurut beliau)
4. Darah haid (lain dari darah haid (iaitu darah biasa) tidak najis menurut beliau).
5. Daging babi

Hanya lima di atas sahaja –menurut Imam Syaukani- yang mempunyai dalil yang jelas dari Syarak tentang kenajisannya. Selain darinya adalah khilaf di kalangan ulamak”.[2]

Adapun dalam mazhab Syafi’ie, ada 13 perkara yang diputuskan sebagai najis berdasarkan ijtihad ulamak-ulamak mazhab, iaitu;
1. Anjing; semua juzuk di badan anjing adalah najis.
2. Babi; semua juzuk di badan babi adalah najis.
3. Air kencing; semua jenis air kencing adalah najis sama ada dari manusia atau haiwan.
4. Tahi; semua jenis tahi adalah najis sama ada tahi manusia atau haiwan.
5. Air mazi; iaitu cecair nipis berwarna kekuningan yang keluar dari kemaluan ketika naik syahwat.
6. Air madi; iaitu cecair kental berwarna putih yang keluar dari kemaluan selepas kencing atau selepas keletihan.
7. Arak dan semua minuman yang memabukkan seperti tuak dan seumpamanya.
8. Bangkai/mayat; kecuali mayat manusia, bangkai haiwan laut (ikan dan sebagainya) dan belalang.
9. Darah; semua jenis darah adalah najis sama ada darah manusia atau haiwan.
10. Nanah
11. Anggota yang terpisah dari haiwan ketika masih hidupnya; kecuali bulu binatang yang halal dimakan seperti bulu biri-biri, bulu ayam dan sebagainya.
12. Susu binatang yang tidak halal dimakan dagingnya.
13. Muntah

Apakah kaifiyat bersuci dari najis yang ditetapkan oleh Syarak?

1. Bersuci dengan menggunakan air
2. Bersuci dengan air bercampur tanah
3. Bersuci dengan benda-benda kesat
4. Bersuci dengan menggosok ke tanah

Bagaimana caranya bersuci dengan air?

(4) Menggunakan air adalah cara asal dalam bersuci. Tidak harus berpaling dari menggunakan air dalam bersuci kecuali dengan keizinan dari Syarak. 

Adapun cara bersuci dengan air ialah;

Kedua; Basuh tempat yang terkena najis itu dengan air hingga hilang sifat-sifatnya iaitu warnanya, baunya dan rasanya. Jika sekali basuhan telah dapat menghilangkannya, tidak perlu lagi diulangi basuhan. Jika tidak, wajib diulangi lagi basuhan termasuk dengan menggosok-gosoknya atau melakukan seumpamanya. Setelah dibasuh berulang kali, namun warna najis masih tidak tanggal atau baunya masih tidak hilang, ketika itu dimaafkan, yakni basuhan dianggap sempurna dan tidak perlu diulangi lagi.

Dikecualikan jika najis itu ialah air kencing kanak-kanak lelaki yang belum berumur dua tahun dan belum menikmati sebarang makanan kecuali susu ibunya, maka memadai dengan merenjis air hingga meratai kawasan yang terkena air kencing itu, kemudian dibiarkan kering. Tidak perlu membasuhnya atau mengalirkan air ke atasnya. Ummu Qais binti Mihsan –radhiyallahu ‘anha-. Menceritakan; “Beliau membawa seorang bayi lelaki yang belum memakan sebarang makanan kepada Rasulullah –sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam-, tiba-tiba bayi itu kencing di atas pakaian baginda. Baginda meminta air, lalu merenjis pakaiannya dan baginda tidak membasuhnya”. (Riwayat Imam al-Bukhari)

Apakah najis yang perlu dibasuh menggunakan air bercampur tanah? Bagaimana caranya?

(5) Iaitu najis anjing kerana Nabi –sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam- bersabda; “Apabila bekas kamu dijilat oleh anjing, hendaklah kamu membasuhnya tujuh kali; kali pertama dengan tanah” (Riwayat Imam Muslim). Caranya ialah;

Pertama; Buang najis terlebih dahulu
Kedua; Basuh tempat yang terkena najis anjing itu dengan air yang bercampur tanah (sekali sahaja).
Ketiga; Bilas dengan air biasa sebanyak enam kali.

(6) Oleh kerana cara membasuh najis anjing di atas lebih berat berbanding cara membasuh najis-najis yang lain, maka kerana itu najis anjing dinamakan ulamak dengan najis mughallazah (najis berat).

Adakah najis babi juga mesti di basuh dengan air bercampur tanah?

(7) Ulamak-ulamak berbeza pandangan tentang babi; adakah ia termasuk dalam najis berat (mughalladzah) sebagaimana anjing di atas, atau ia hanya terdiri dari najis biasa (seperti arak, air kencing, tahi dan sebagainya) yang mencukupi dibasuh dengan air seperti biasa? Ada dua pandangan;

(8) Pertama; Jumhur ulamak berpandangan; babi sama seperti najis-najis yang lain, iaitu mencukupi dibasuh seperti biasa hingga hilang kesan-kesannya. Tidak perlu diulangi basuhan hingga tujuh kali dan tidak perlu menggunakan tanah. Mengikut pandangan jumhur ulamak, najis berat hanya satu sahaja iaitu anjing. Dalil mereka ialah sabda Nabi –sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam-; “Apabila anjing menjilat bekas salah seseorang dari kamu, cara menyucinya ialah dengan ia membasuhnya sebanyak tujuh kali, kali pertamanya dengan tanah” (Riwayat Imam Muslim dari Abu Hurairah –radhiyallahu ‘anhu-). Di dalam hadis ini, Nabi hanya menyebut anjing sahaja, tidak menyebutkan najis yang lain termasuk babi.

Kedua; mengikut mazhab Syafi’ie; babi sama seperti anjing, oleh itu ia mesti dibasuh sebanyak tujuh kali dan salah satu basuhan mesti dengan air bercampur tanah. 
Dalil mereka ialah dengan (9) mengkiaskannya kepada anjing kerana babi lebih buruk keadaannya dari anjing di mana pengharaman memakannya adalah sabit dengan nas al-Quran, adapun pengharaman memakan anjing hanya sabit dengan ijtihad.

Adakah harus tanah digantikan dengan sabun atau bahan pencuci lain?

Bagi masalah ini juga ada perbezaan pandangan di kalangan ulamak;

Pandangan pertama; tidak harus kerana cucian dengan tanah itu adalah arahan Syarak. Halnya sama (10) seperti tayammum yang diarahkan oleh Syarak menggunakan tanah, maka tidak harus dialihkan kepada yang lain. Arahan menggunakan tanah itu bersifat ibadah, oleh itu tidak harus dinilai berdasarkan akal atau logik. Ini adalah pandangan yang rajih dalam mazhab Syafi’ie.

Pandangan kedua; harus tanah itu digantikan dengan sabun kerana penggunaan sabun lebih berkesan dari tanah dalam menghilangkan najis. Nabi menyebutkan tanah dalam hadis tadi bukan bertujuan membataskannya kepada tanah, tetapi untuk menegaskan perlunya penyucian najis berat itu dibantu dengan bahan lain di samping air. Masalah ini ada (11) persamaannya dengan istinjak di mana selain dengan air, Nabi juga mengharuskan istinjak dengan batu. Menurut ulamak; walaupun nabi hanya menyebutkan batu, namun dikiaskan kepadanya bahan-bahan lain yang bersifat kesat dan berupaya menanggalkan najis seperti kertas, tisu kesat dan sebagainya. Nabi menyebut batu bukanlah bertujuan membataskannya kepada batu, tetapi untuk menjelaskan keharusan beristinjak dengan batu atau bahan-bahan lain yang mempunyai sifat yang sama. Ini adalah pandangan jumhur ulamak mazhab Hanbali.

Pandangan ketiga; Dalam keadaan terdapat tanah, wajiblah basuhan menggunakan tanah dan tidak harus berpindah kepada bahan yang lain sama ada sabun atau sebagainya. Jika tidak ada tanah, barulah harus menggunakan bahan yang lain menggantikan tanah. Ini adalah pandangan Abu Hamid (salah seorang ulamak mazhab Hanbali).

Apakah yang dimaksudkan dengan benda-benda kesat? Bilakah harus bersuci dengannya?

Benda-benda kesat adalah seperti batu, kertas atau tisu yang kesat, kayu dan sebagainya. Benda-benda kesat ini harus digunakan untuk beristinjak iaitu membersihkan najis di kemaluan setelah kencing atau berak. Telah sabit di dalam hadis bahawa Nabi sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam- menggunakan batu untuk beristinjak. Maka dikiaskan kepadanya segala benda yang kesat yang dapat menanggalkan najis dari dua saluran tersebut.

Apa syarat beristinjak dengan benda kesat?

Paling baik ialah berinstinjak dengan air kerana ia lebih menyucikan. Diharuskan beristinjak dengan benda-benda kesat sahaja sekalipun terdapat air, tetapi hendaklah dengan memenuhi syarat-syarat di bawah;

1. Hendaklah dengan sekurang-kurangnya tiga kali sapuan. Tidak harus kurang dari tiga kali sapuan sekalipun telah kelihatan bersih dengan sekali atau dua kali sapuan. Ini kerana tiga kali sapuan itu adalah had minima yang ditetapkan Nabi –sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam-. Salman –radhiyallahu ‘anhu- menceritakan; “Nabi menegah kami dari beristinjak kurang dari tiga batu (yakni tiga sapuan batu)” (Riwayat Imam Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmizi, Abu Daud dan Nasai). Jika tiga kali sapuan tidak mencukupi, wajib ditambah dan sunat tambahan itu ganjil (yakni lima, tujuh dan sebagainya).

2. Hendaklah najis tidak melepasi papan punggung atau hasyafah (yakni kepala zakar). Jika najis meleleh melepasi kawasan tersebut, wajib istinjak dengan air.

3. Hendaklah sebelum najis kering. Jika najis telah kering, wajib istinjak dengan air.

4. Bahan yang digunakan hendaklah bersih dan kering. Sifatnya hendaklah boleh menanggalkan najis, iaitu tidak terlalu licin atau terlalu kasar kerana tujuan intinjak ialah untuk menanggalkan najis, maka hendaklah bahan yang digunakan boleh memenuhi tujuan tersebut.

5. Bahan yang digunakan bukan dari makanan manusia atau jin seperti tulang. Sabda Nabi; “Janganlah kamu beristinjak dengan tahi binatang, dan juga dengan tulang kerana ia adalah makanan saudara kamu dari kalangan jin”. (Riwayat Imam at-Tirmizi)

Bagaimana yang dikatakan bersuci dengan menggosok ke tanah?

Iaitu cara bersuci yang disebut oleh Nabi di dalam hadisnya; “Jika seseorang kamu datang ke masjid, hendaklah ia menterbalikkan dua sepatunya dan memerhatikannya; jika ia nampak ada najis, hendaklah ia menggosoknya ke tanah, kemudian tunaikan solat dengan memakai sepatunya itu”. (Riwayat Imam Ahmad, Abu Daud, Ibnu Hibban dan al-Hakim dari Abu Said al-Khudri r.a.).

Berdalilkan hadis ini, sebahagian ulamak –antaranya Imam Abu Hanifah- menegaskan; “Kasut atau sepatu yang terkena najis –sama ada kering atau basah- memadai menyucinya dengan menggosoknya ke tanah hingga hilang kesan najis pada kasut tersebut”.

Bagaimana cara menyucikan tanah yang dikenai najis?

Tanah yang terkena najis, cara menyucinya ialah;
Pertama; hendaklah dibuang terlebih dahulu najis jika kelihatan.
Kedua; setelah dibuang najis, curahkan sebaldi air ke atas tanah yang terkena najis itu dan biarkan ia kering. Abu Hurairah r.a. telah menceritakan; “Seorang lelaki dari pedalaman datang ke masjid Nabi s.a.w.. Tiba-tiba ia bangun dan kencing di satu penjuru masjid. Lalu Nabi s.a.w. berkata; “’Curahkan sebaldi air ke atas tempat yang terkena air kencingnya”. (Riwayat Imam al-Bukhari)

Jika seseorang itu selepas mengerjakan solat, ia ternampak najis di pakaiannya; adakah wajib ia mengulangi solatnya?

Para ulamak berbeza pandangan dalam masalah ini;

1. Ulamak-ulamak mazhab Syafi’ie- menegaskan; batal solatnya dan wajib diulangi kerana ia menunaikan solat dalam keadaan tidak memenuhi syarat sahnya iaitu bersuci. Adapun sangkaannya semasa sedang solat –bahawa ia bersih dari najis-, maka sangkaan itu tidak dikira kerana telah terbukti salah. Kaedah Fiqh menyebutkan; “Tidak diambil kira sangkaan yag telah ternyata salahnya”.

2. Menurut mazhab Imam Abu Hanifah; tidak batal solatnya jika najis itu sedikit. Jika najis itu banyak, batallah solat dan wajib diulangi semula.

3. Ada ulamak berpandangan; tidak batal solatnya secara keseluruhannya sama ada najis itu sedikit atau banyak. Mereka berdalilkan hadis dari Abu Sa’id al-Khudri –radhiyallahu ‘anhu- yang menceritakan; “Suatu hari kami mengerjakan solat bersama Nabi –sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam-. Ditengah solat, Nabi menanggalkan dua kasutnya dan meletaknya di sebelah kirinya. Melihat berbuatan Nabi itu, kami pun turut melakukannya. Selesai solat, Nabi bertanya; “Kenapa kamu semua menanggalkan kasut?”. Kami menjawab; “Kami melihat kamu melakukannya, maka kami pun turut melakukannya”. Nabi berkata; “Di tengah solat tadi, Jibril datang kepadaku dan memberitahu bahawa di kasutku terdapat najis/kekotoran, maka kerana itulah aku menanggalkannya. Jika seseorang kamu datang ke masjid, hendaklah ia menterbalikkan dua kasutnya dan memerhatikannya; jika ia nampak ada najis, hendaklah ia menggosoknya ke tanah, kemudian bolehlah ia menunaikan solat dengan memakai kasutnya itu” (Riwayat Imam Ahmad dan Abu Daud). Berkata Imam al-Khattabi; hadis ini menjadi dalil bahawa sesiapa menunaikan solat sedang di pakaiannya terdapat najis yang tidak diketahuinya, maka solatnya adalah sah dan tidak perlu ia mengulanginya”. [3] Selain Imam al-Khattabi, ulamak yang berpandangan serupa ialah Imam Ibnu Taimiyyah. Di dalam al-Fatawa al-Kubra, Imam Ibnu Taimiyyah menegaskan; “Sesiapa menunaikan solat dengan ada najis (di pakainnya) kerana lupa atau tidak tahu, tidak perlu ia ulangi solatnya”.[4]

Nota Kaki

[1] Bidayatul-Mujtahid (1/101).
[2] Ad-Darari al-Madhiyyah, halaman 18.
[3] Bidayatul-Mujtahid (1/100).
[4] Al-Fatawa al-Kubra (5/327).
Posted by USTAZ AHMAD ADNAN FADZIL

http://pakatan09.blogspot.my/2010/02/bersuci-mensucikan-najis.html

IBN RUSHD: BIDAYAH AL-MUJTAHID: NAJIS

 بداية المجتهد ونهاية المقتصد » كتاب الطهارة من النجس



الْبَابُ الثَّانِي 

فِي مَعْرِفَةِ أَنْوَاعِ النَّجَاسَاتِ . 

وَأَمَّا أَنْوَاعُ النَّجَاسَاتِ ، فَإِنَّ الْعُلَمَاءَ اتَّفَقُوا مِنْ أَعْيَانِهَا عَلَى أَرْبَعَةٍ : مَيْتَةِ الْحَيَوَانِ ذِي الدَّمِ الَّذِي لَيْسَ بِمَائِيٍّ ، وَعَلَى لَحْمِ الْخِنْزِيرِ بِأَيِّ سَبَبٍ اتَّفَقَ أَنْ تَذْهَبَ حَيَاتُهُ ، وَعَلَى الدَّمِ نَفْسِهِ مِنَ الْحَيَوَانِ الَّذِي لَيْسَ بِمَائِيٍّ انْفَصَلَ مِنَ الْحَيِّ أَوِ الْمَيِّتِ إِذَا كَانَ مَسْفُوحًا ( أَعْنِي : كَثِيرًا ) وَعَلَى بَوْلِ ابْنِ آدَمَ وَرَجِيعِهِ ، وَأَكْثَرُهُمْ عَلَى نَجَاسَةِ الْخَمْرِ ، وَفِي ذَلِكَ خِلَافٌ عَنْ بَعْضِ الْمُحَدِّثِينَ ، وَاخْتَلَفُوا فِي غَيْرِ ذَلِكَ 

GHINA' IBN AL-ARABI




وَأَمَّا الْغِنَاءُ فَإِنَّهُ مِنْ اللَّهْوِ الْمُهَيِّجِ لِلْقُلُوبِ عِنْدَ أَكْثَرِ الْعُلَمَاءِ ، مِنْهُمْ مَالِكُ بْنُ أَنَسٍ ، وَلَيْسَ فِي الْقُرْآنِ وَلَا فِي السُّنَّةِ دَلِيلٌ عَلَى تَحْرِيمِهِ . [ ص: 11 ] 
أَمَّا إنَّ فِي الْحَدِيثِ الصَّحِيحِ [ دَلِيلًا عَلَى ] إبَاحَتِهِ ، وَهُوَ الْحَدِيثُ الصَّحِيحُ { أَنَّ أَبَا بَكْرٍ دَخَلَ عَلَى عَائِشَةَ وَعِنْدَهَا جَارِيَتَانِ حَادِيَتَانِ مِنْ حَادِيَاتِ الْأَنْصَارِ ، تُغَنِّيَانِ بِمَا تَقَاوَلَتْ الْأَنْصَارُ بِهِ يَوْمَ بُعَاثٍ ، فَقَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ : أَمِزْمَارُ الشَّيْطَانِ فِي بَيْتِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ : دَعْهُمَا يَا أَبَا بَكْرٍ ، فَإِنَّهُ يَوْمُ عِيدٍ } فَلَوْ كَانَ الْغِنَاءُ حَرَامًا مَا كَانَ فِي بَيْتِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ . 
وَقَدْ أَنْكَرَهُ أَبُو بَكْرٍ بِظَاهِرِ الْحَالِ ، فَأَقَرَّهُ النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ بِفَضْلِ الرُّخْصَةِ وَالرِّفْقِ بِالْخَلِيقَةِ فِي إجْمَامِ الْقُلُوبِ ; إذْ لَيْسَ جَمِيعُهَا يَحْمِلُ الْجِدَّ دَائِمًا . 
وَتَعْلِيلُ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ بِأَنَّهُ يَوْمُ عِيدٍ يَدُلُّ عَلَى كَرَاهِيَةِ دَوَامِهِ ، وَرُخْصَتِهِ فِي الْأَسْبَابِ كَالْعِيدِ ، وَالْعُرْسِ ، وَقُدُومِ الْغَائِبِ ، وَنَحْوِ ذَلِكَ مِنْ الْمُجْتَمَعَاتِ الَّتِي تُؤَلِّفُ بَيْنَ الْمُفْتَرِقِينَ وَالْمُفْتَرِقَاتِ عَادَةً . وَكُلُّ حَدِيثٍ يُرْوَى فِي التَّحْرِيمِ أَوْ آيَةٍ تُتْلَى فِيهِ فَإِنَّهُ بَاطِلٌ سَنَدًا ، بَاطِلٌ مُعْتَقَدًا ، خَبَرًا وَتَأْوِيلًا ، وَقَدْ ثَبَتَ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ رَخَّصَ فِي الْغِنَاءِ فِي الْعِيدَيْنِ ، وَفِي الْبُكَاءِ عَلَى الْمَيِّتِ مِنْ غَيْرِ نَوْحٍ مِنْ حَدِيثِ ثَابِتِ ابْنِ وَدِيعَةَ .